EVE Search - CSM chair declaring war on CCP, tells players to bring gasolin.

All Channels

EVE General Discussion

CSM chair declaring war on CCP, tells players to bring gasolin.

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Sullen Skoung	Posted - 2011.09.03 23:10:00 - [1] Originally by: Tippia Originally by: Kengutsi Akira That whole "no ice for you in highsec" and "we're gonna take all the best agents an put em in 0.0" and the other **** they lain out, when combined with the "watch what they do not what they say" argument seem to support them killing off highsec. àyou mean apart from the fact that moving the best agents will have zero effect on highsec and that the ôno iceö statement was more along the lines of ôonly some ice products will be available through highsec beltsö, so the effect of that will be minimal as well. right who needs good agents in high sec. all the mission runners will go to 0.0 you must work for CCP to be that deluded -------- CCP knows better than the players whats good for their game. SOE knew what was best for SWG too. Better than all those players that left too.
Sullen Skoung	Posted - 2011.09.03 23:38:00 - [2] Edited by: Sullen Skoung on 03/09/2011 23:40:01 Originally by: Tippia ... brain-damaged retardation you have issues with the mentally impaired I see. Self loathing? Originally by: Cipher Jones Edited by: Cipher Jones on 03/09/2011 17:46:21 What a **ing baby. Brags about what he got and complains about what he didnt get. Welcome to the 7th grade playground at recess. If you expect to be able to control CCP's management at a macro level you are a **ing tool. Your really surprised about this? ...really?? -------- CCP knows better than the players whats good for their game. SOE knew what was best for SWG too. Better than all those players that left too.
Sullen Skoung	Posted - 2011.09.05 04:42:00 - [3] There is the interesting question of whether or not CCP is **ing off all the ppl an not caring in a manner of culling the herd. They get rid of all the ppl that will * and pitch a fit about pay2win so they can have something like a grand re-opening and get more players in the game that WONT *** an wont care. Thats not tinfoil, thats just a theory -------- CCP knows better than the players whats good for their game. SOE knew what was best for SWG too. Better than all those players that left too.
Sullen Skoung	Posted - 2011.09.05 06:46:00 - [4] Originally by: Ladie Scarlet Edited by: Ladie Scarlet on 05/09/2011 05:08:37 Originally by: Sullen Skoung They get rid of all the ppl that will *** and pitch a fit about pay2win so they can have something like a grand re-opening and get more players in the game that WONT *** an wont care. Somebody should ask John Smedley how that worked out for Star Wars: Galaxies and the NGE patch. Somebody should look at my sig I already said that :D -------- CCP knows better than the players whats good for their game. SOE knew what was best for SWG too. Better than all those players that left too.
Sullen Skoung	Posted - 2011.09.05 07:41:00 - [5] Edited by: Sullen Skoung on 05/09/2011 07:42:57 Originally by: Thornat High Sec is a very small portion of Eve gameplay, you are aware 80% of the player base plays in high sec and HAS NO INTEREST in 0.0 you saying in essence they are playing the game wrong is arrogant at best. your post make me laugh cause it reeks of tears and... umad bro? -------- CCP knows better than the players whats good for their game. SOE knew what was best for SWG too. Better than all those players that left too.
Sullen Skoung	Posted - 2011.09.05 07:50:00 - [6] Originally by: Thornat Originally by: Sullen Skoung Originally by: Thornat High Sec is a very small portion of Eve gameplay, you are aware 80% of the player base plays in high sec and HAS NO INTEREST in 0.0 you saying in essence they are playing the game wrong is arrogant at best. Not at all. I'm not saying they are wrong. Who are you to tell 80% of the ppl in this game how to play it? lol ley CCP change Highsec, so that its not worth living in. 80% of the players is the game - well I usually say 60%, Im, fairly certain 20% will adapt, but 60% of the ppl in the game will LEAVE THE GAME Yeah thats not significant. Hence why I see ****ing off 80% of the ppl in the game as the CU/NGE of EVE see sig -------- CCP knows better than the players whats good for their game. SOE knew what was best for SWG too. Better than all those players that left too.
Sullen Skoung	Posted - 2011.09.05 07:58:00 - [7] Edited by: Sullen Skoung on 05/09/2011 08:02:08 Originally by: Thornat And I've been playing the game for 7 years thats who the **** I am. so I should care what you think? Well I dont an you being here that long is very whoop de doo. Tell that to the ppl that unsub an leave you to play by yourself when they do what you want. You honestly think much dev time is gonna be dedicated here with 40% of the population left? lol SOE thought they were doing "the right thing" back then too They probably felt just like you do now an you "Ive been playing here 7 years blah blah blah" bittervets who want to destroy the game for ppl that live in highsec (lol you should be in Goons. They want to destroy YOUR game too) are the reason noone wants to go to 0.0, above all else. so you make high sec crap, theyll STILL not want to go there, youll be in the same place you are now, but bleeding subs even faster as ppl that dont want to put up with their game dying, leaving to find a game they CAN play "right" Oh hey wait, I thought this was supposed to be a sandbox? There is no right and wrong... -------- CCP knows better than the players whats good for their game. SOE knew what was best for SWG too. Better than all those players that left too.
Sullen Skoung	Posted - 2011.09.05 08:41:00 - [8] Originally by: Felix Emlen This systematically encourages highseccer's to push their comfort zones into nullsec, which is what CCP hoped for anyway. which will systematically push ppl out of this game and thats what the 0.0 ppl seem to want anyways. Well thats cool, when you have less than half the population of the game left, youll have plenty of room for yourselves I guess. Itll be great for you that say. Funny thought, Im the only voice of opposition in this thread lol Ill keep fighting the fight cause Im bored tho. Quote: I'm sorry oh come on be a real troll/bittervet and dont lie about this part at least. Youre not sorry -------- CCP knows better than the players whats good for their game. SOE knew what was best for SWG too. Better than all those players that left too.
Sullen Skoung	Posted - 2011.09.05 08:47:00 - [9] Originally by: Ladie Scarlet Originally by: Sullen Skoung which will systematically push ppl out of this game and thats what the 0.0 ppl seem to want anyways. Well thats cool, when you have less than half the population of the game left, youll have plenty of room for yourselves I guess. I see no downside to a bunch of highsec pubbies quitting the game. At the very least it will improve lag. A Goon wouldnt Why is this not a surprise to me? You all have been trying to kill off the highsec ppl's ability to play the game forever lol -------- CCP knows better than the players whats good for their game. SOE knew what was best for SWG too. Better than all those players that left too.
Sullen Skoung	Posted - 2011.09.05 09:04:00 - [10] Originally by: Thornat What is more likely to happen is that the vets like me who have supported the game for years will continue to do so, while the nubs like you who are likely to flush out lol yes, lets leave the game for the bittervets to fight over. If you dont play the game "right" gtfo have fun in your empty sandbox pal -------- CCP knows better than the players whats good for their game. SOE knew what was best for SWG too. Better than all those players that left too.
Sullen Skoung	Posted - 2011.09.05 09:58:00 - [11] Originally by: Felix Emlen Say 90% of the population of a terrible game like WoW didn't want to run end game boss instances- does that mean they deserve almost the same goodies from completing quests as those that put in the effort to do the bosses? I'm sorry, but you are a terrible poster and have no appreciation for the workings of game balance. I sorry, IM a terrible poster an youre trying to compare EVE and WoW. gl with that cause your analogy doesnt even hold up. WoW is a Theme Park non sandbox game that has a very clearly defined levelling path and direction in game play none of which exist here. No level, no path, no wrong way to play, unless one listens to the ppl above. -------- CCP knows better than the players whats good for their game. SOE knew what was best for SWG too. Better than all those players that left too.
Sullen Skoung	Posted - 2011.09.05 19:30:00 - [12] I just think its funny Helicity got banned (and later supposedly unbanned) for telling a Dev to "diaf" an using his/her real name yet you talk about starting fires and get the gasoline ready, and use an alternate name for one of the CCPs (Im not buddy buddy, Im not gonna use it, I dont wanna get banned), and its all good. Then again, Im tinfoiling in that I think Helicity was unbanned to keep them from having to enforce that here lol -------- CCP knows better than the players whats good for their game. SOE knew what was best for SWG too. Better than all those players that left too.
Sullen Skoung	Posted - 2011.09.05 19:50:00 - [13] Originally by: General Windypops Originally by: Feligast Originally by: General Windypops Where's the dimension of CSMing where you liten to the playerbase rather than simply trying to force your personal idea of 'fun' and political agenda on the rest of us? Show me where the "playerbase" in any way is united on what is fun. Precisely why I feel passionately that the CSM should have been balanced rather than representing a single-interest cartel. which is why the election process in this game will never work. Unless you make voting mandatory upon log in, you will never get a larger group of players than the Goons voting at any one time for obvious reasons -------- CCP knows better than the players whats good for their game. SOE knew what was best for SWG too. Better than all those players that left too.
Sullen Skoung	Posted - 2011.09.05 21:11:00 - [14] Originally by: Ladie Scarlet Originally by: Puppet Mas'ter what % of the players voted again? And what percentage of that was goons voting for goons? It's not our fault if the pubbies didn't vote. Take it up with them. Hence why Im saying the voting system will NEVER work here. Unless you make it a manditory upon log in, one vote per account type thing. Even that falls down due to ppl having multiple accounts and "pubbies" who dont know any names other than EVE famous ppl. So... a voting system will never work in this game. Regardless of who votes an who doesnt -------- CCP knows better than the players whats good for their game. SOE knew what was best for SWG too. Better than all those players that left too.
Sullen Skoung	Posted - 2011.09.05 22:20:00 - [15] Originally by: Paragon Renegade It's like watching Halo fans argue about Armour Lock. This is a good thing. never played much halo whats armor lock lol -------- CCP knows better than the players whats good for their game. SOE knew what was best for SWG too. Better than all those players that left too.
Sullen Skoung	Posted - 2011.09.05 22:22:00 - [16] Originally by: BehindDOORNEX***** They might give us an insight into CCP's thought process - well Hilmars at least, Hilmar's though prosesses cant be more well spelled out -------- CCP knows better than the players whats good for their game. SOE knew what was best for SWG too. Better than all those players that left too.
Sullen Skoung	Posted - 2011.09.05 23:49:00 - [17] Edited by: Sullen Skoung on 05/09/2011 23:51:24 Countdown till Mittens gets banned and his name censored on the forums like ********** CCP doesnt have a good history with ppl that blow the whistle on them odd how quickly the "news" agencies are finding his blog isnt it -------- CCP knows better than the players whats good for their game. SOE knew what was best for SWG too. Better than all those players that left too.
Sullen Skoung	Posted - 2011.09.06 01:23:00 - [18] Originally by: Discrodia Forcing voting is stupid because that's not how democracy works. yes well democracy doesnt really work in a system where you can make 3 new voters as much as youre willing to pay for them (alt accounts).

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.